<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 296 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110755</link>
    <description>The court found errors in the Division Bench&#039;s order, remanding the matter to the Trial Judge for reconsideration. The Official Liquidator was directed to pay Rs. 30,000 monthly without proof of lease breach. The lessor must demonstrate the right to reclaim possession post-breach. The appellant&#039;s cited decisions were deemed irrelevant. The Division Bench&#039;s order was recalled for fresh consideration in line with these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:00:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 296 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110755</link>
      <description>The court found errors in the Division Bench&#039;s order, remanding the matter to the Trial Judge for reconsideration. The Official Liquidator was directed to pay Rs. 30,000 monthly without proof of lease breach. The lessor must demonstrate the right to reclaim possession post-breach. The appellant&#039;s cited decisions were deemed irrelevant. The Division Bench&#039;s order was recalled for fresh consideration in line with these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>