<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 458 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110751</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against an order-in-original that confiscated goods and imposed penalties for alleged violations of an EPCG license. Despite a technical violation, the Tribunal found the confiscation and penalties unjustified as the appellants had informed authorities about the installation of imported computer systems, fulfilled export obligations, and did not breach other conditions. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting any permissible consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:55:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 458 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110751</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against an order-in-original that confiscated goods and imposed penalties for alleged violations of an EPCG license. Despite a technical violation, the Tribunal found the confiscation and penalties unjustified as the appellants had informed authorities about the installation of imported computer systems, fulfilled export obligations, and did not breach other conditions. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting any permissible consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>