<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 457 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110750</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against orders dropping proceedings related to the marketability of potassium chlorate in crystal form was rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals). The authorities found that the Revenue failed to provide evidence supporting the marketability of the item, shifting the burden of proof to the Revenue. As the Department did not present evidence of marketability, the impugned orders were upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:39:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 457 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110750</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against orders dropping proceedings related to the marketability of potassium chlorate in crystal form was rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals). The authorities found that the Revenue failed to provide evidence supporting the marketability of the item, shifting the burden of proof to the Revenue. As the Department did not present evidence of marketability, the impugned orders were upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>