https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110747 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench's decision to refuse a review of its judgment in Company Appeal No. 3 of 2002. The appellant, a legal representative of an ex-Director of a company in liquidation, challenged the dismissal of the misfeasance application order review. The Court found the appellant's conduct dilatory, dismissing the appeal and subsequent review petition. Despite doubts on the appeal's maintainability under section 483 of the Companies Act, the Court proceeded, emphasizing the appellant's failure to present valid contentions. The High Court's decision was deemed justified, and the appeal was dismissed without interference. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110747 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench's decision to refuse a review of its judgment in Company Appeal No. 3 of 2002. The appellant, a legal representative of an ex-Director of a company in liquidation, challenged the dismissal of the misfeasance application order review. The Court found the appellant's conduct dilatory, dismissing the appeal and subsequent review petition. Despite doubts on the appeal's maintainability under section 483 of the Companies Act, the Court proceeded, emphasizing the appellant's failure to present valid contentions. The High Court's decision was deemed justified, and the appeal was dismissed without interference. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110747