<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 284 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110727</link>
    <description>A penalty already imposed and finalised under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 could still be recovered as arrears of land revenue after the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 commenced. The saving clause in section 49 preserved completed proceedings under the repealed Act, and section 49(3) did not assist the challenger because adjudication had been concluded before the later Act came into force. The beneficial penalty and civil imprisonment provisions in sections 13 and 14 of the later Act did not apply to a concluded adjudication under the repealed statute. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 also supported continuance of the liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 284 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110727</link>
      <description>A penalty already imposed and finalised under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 could still be recovered as arrears of land revenue after the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 commenced. The saving clause in section 49 preserved completed proceedings under the repealed Act, and section 49(3) did not assist the challenger because adjudication had been concluded before the later Act came into force. The beneficial penalty and civil imprisonment provisions in sections 13 and 14 of the later Act did not apply to a concluded adjudication under the repealed statute. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 also supported continuance of the liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>