https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110724 The High Court overturned previous decisions and allowed the appeal in a case involving the interpretation of clause 8 of a license deed. The Court applied the principle of 'piercing the corporate veil' to determine that the petitioner's incorporation of a company did not constitute a violation of the clause, emphasizing the continuity of ownership and control. The Court directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the premises, concluding that the petitioner had not breached the terms of the license deed. en-us Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:23:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110724 The High Court overturned previous decisions and allowed the appeal in a case involving the interpretation of clause 8 of a license deed. The Court applied the principle of 'piercing the corporate veil' to determine that the petitioner's incorporation of a company did not constitute a violation of the clause, emphasizing the continuity of ownership and control. The Court directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the premises, concluding that the petitioner had not breached the terms of the license deed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110724