<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 625 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110723</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q was not justified where the assessee wrongly availed Modvat credit but reversed it before the show cause notice and informed the department of the error. The decisive factor was the absence of intention to evade duty or defraud the Revenue; without such culpable intent, the factual basis for penalty was not made out. Relief was therefore available to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:25:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 625 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110723</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q was not justified where the assessee wrongly availed Modvat credit but reversed it before the show cause notice and informed the department of the error. The decisive factor was the absence of intention to evade duty or defraud the Revenue; without such culpable intent, the factual basis for penalty was not made out. Relief was therefore available to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>