<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 428 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110718</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, represented by Shri Naresh Thacker, Advocate. The tribunal set aside the imposition of redemption fine and penalty, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:19:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 428 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110718</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, represented by Shri Naresh Thacker, Advocate. The tribunal set aside the imposition of redemption fine and penalty, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>