<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 253 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110715</link>
    <description>A Company Court may sanction a compromise and arrangement when the statutory majority supports it, material facts are disclosed, and the scheme is fair, lawful and not contrary to public policy; it does not reassess the commercial wisdom of creditors and shareholders. The text explains that Reserve Bank objections based on its statutory powers do not by themselves prevent sanction where the scheme serves stakeholders and is preferable to winding up. It also notes that disputed creditor-status claims may be rejected where secured status is not established, and pending civil and criminal proceedings may be kept in abeyance to support the approved scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:13:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 253 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110715</link>
      <description>A Company Court may sanction a compromise and arrangement when the statutory majority supports it, material facts are disclosed, and the scheme is fair, lawful and not contrary to public policy; it does not reassess the commercial wisdom of creditors and shareholders. The text explains that Reserve Bank objections based on its statutory powers do not by themselves prevent sanction where the scheme serves stakeholders and is preferable to winding up. It also notes that disputed creditor-status claims may be rejected where secured status is not established, and pending civil and criminal proceedings may be kept in abeyance to support the approved scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>