<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 393 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110696</link>
    <description>Caps, rods and mascara brushes were treated as not being ready-for-use consumer goods because they required further processing before they could satisfy human needs. Applying its earlier rulings on identical and similar cosmetic components, CESTAT held that such goods were freely importable by an actual user without a specific import licence where the policy permitted free import. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:31:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 393 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110696</link>
      <description>Caps, rods and mascara brushes were treated as not being ready-for-use consumer goods because they required further processing before they could satisfy human needs. Applying its earlier rulings on identical and similar cosmetic components, CESTAT held that such goods were freely importable by an actual user without a specific import licence where the policy permitted free import. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>