<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 474 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110694</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding the availability of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) benefits for bathroom radiators made from seamless/ERW steel tubes was disposed of. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to reject DEPB benefits under any entry, including entry no. 117, due to the appellants introducing a new claim for benefits under entry no. 152 at the appeal stage, which was impermissible according to a Supreme Court precedent. The Tribunal also criticized the Commissioner&#039;s broad finding without prior notice to the appellants, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and specific notice in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:17:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 474 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110694</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding the availability of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) benefits for bathroom radiators made from seamless/ERW steel tubes was disposed of. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to reject DEPB benefits under any entry, including entry no. 117, due to the appellants introducing a new claim for benefits under entry no. 152 at the appeal stage, which was impermissible according to a Supreme Court precedent. The Tribunal also criticized the Commissioner&#039;s broad finding without prior notice to the appellants, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and specific notice in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>