https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110678 A finding of breach of an MRTP Commission restraint order required a proper statutory investigation under section 13A before violation could be recorded; without that enquiry, the finding could not stand. The earlier restraint order was also too vague to extend to a later advertisement relating to a housing scheme and real estate, because it did not clearly define the prohibited practice and real estate became part of the statutory concept of services only prospectively. On that basis, the Commission's order was held unsustainable in law and set aside. en-us Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110678 A finding of breach of an MRTP Commission restraint order required a proper statutory investigation under section 13A before violation could be recorded; without that enquiry, the finding could not stand. The earlier restraint order was also too vague to extend to a later advertisement relating to a housing scheme and real estate, because it did not clearly define the prohibited practice and real estate became part of the statutory concept of services only prospectively. On that basis, the Commission's order was held unsustainable in law and set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110678