<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 458 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order-in-appeal, reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 1,45,194 to Rs. 25,000. The appellant&#039;s proactive disclosure of duty liability before the enactment of Section 11AC and voluntary payment were considered in determining the penalty amount. The appeal against the penalty aspect was successful, with the Tribunal acknowledging the appellant&#039;s cooperation and reducing the penalty accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:11:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 458 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order-in-appeal, reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 1,45,194 to Rs. 25,000. The appellant&#039;s proactive disclosure of duty liability before the enactment of Section 11AC and voluntary payment were considered in determining the penalty amount. The appeal against the penalty aspect was successful, with the Tribunal acknowledging the appellant&#039;s cooperation and reducing the penalty accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>