https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110668 The court dispensed with the meeting of secured creditors for the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation as all four creditors provided consent. However, a meeting of minority shareholders was deemed necessary, as 10.15% did not consent. Additionally, a meeting of unsecured creditors was ordered to protect the interests of deposit holders who had not given consent. Separate meetings for shareholders and unsecured creditors were scheduled with specific instructions, and the case was listed for further orders. en-us Tue, 06 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:02:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110668 The court dispensed with the meeting of secured creditors for the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation as all four creditors provided consent. However, a meeting of minority shareholders was deemed necessary, as 10.15% did not consent. Additionally, a meeting of unsecured creditors was ordered to protect the interests of deposit holders who had not given consent. Separate meetings for shareholders and unsecured creditors were scheduled with specific instructions, and the case was listed for further orders. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 06 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110668