<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 448 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110657</link>
    <description>Eligibility to small scale industry exemption was treated as a question of law that could be raised while proceedings remained pending, and the original adjudication was incomplete because that issue had not been examined. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh consideration by the original authority, with an opportunity for the party to present its case on the exemption claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:30:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 448 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110657</link>
      <description>Eligibility to small scale industry exemption was treated as a question of law that could be raised while proceedings remained pending, and the original adjudication was incomplete because that issue had not been examined. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh consideration by the original authority, with an opportunity for the party to present its case on the exemption claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>