<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 444 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110651</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for re-opening the matter and scheduled a fresh hearing to address the plea of limitation, emphasizing the importance of ensuring all raised arguments are adequately addressed in the final order. The Tribunal recognized the necessity to delve into the plea despite its absence in the initial order, underscoring the duty to thoroughly examine all relevant issues to uphold justice and fairness in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:22:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 444 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110651</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for re-opening the matter and scheduled a fresh hearing to address the plea of limitation, emphasizing the importance of ensuring all raised arguments are adequately addressed in the final order. The Tribunal recognized the necessity to delve into the plea despite its absence in the initial order, underscoring the duty to thoroughly examine all relevant issues to uphold justice and fairness in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>