https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110649 A writ court will not interfere with a policy-based revival or restructuring decision affecting surplus employees unless it is shown to be vitiated by mala fides, arbitrariness, bias, or other legal infirmity. The challenge to the notice under the voluntary separation scheme and the steps taken to implement the approved revival package was rejected because the record did not disclose any such defect, and the selection of surplus staff was supported by the material on record. The decision was treated as part of the implementation of the revival measures, leaving any further grievance to be pursued before the appropriate statutory forum where available. en-us Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:00:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110649 A writ court will not interfere with a policy-based revival or restructuring decision affecting surplus employees unless it is shown to be vitiated by mala fides, arbitrariness, bias, or other legal infirmity. The challenge to the notice under the voluntary separation scheme and the steps taken to implement the approved revival package was rejected because the record did not disclose any such defect, and the selection of surplus staff was supported by the material on record. The decision was treated as part of the implementation of the revival measures, leaving any further grievance to be pursued before the appropriate statutory forum where available. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110649