<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 443 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to remit duty demand for the loss of denatured ethyl alcohol, citing natural causes such as evaporation and inadequate storage conditions. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity, distinguishing the case from precedent where circumstances varied. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of the order-in-appeal remitting the duty demand based on the natural loss of denatured ethyl alcohol.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:55:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 443 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to remit duty demand for the loss of denatured ethyl alcohol, citing natural causes such as evaporation and inadequate storage conditions. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity, distinguishing the case from precedent where circumstances varied. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of the order-in-appeal remitting the duty demand based on the natural loss of denatured ethyl alcohol.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>