<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 442 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110647</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the order-in-appeal that set aside a duty demand of Rs. 474 for the period from September 1999 to December 1999. The Tribunal found that the loss of denatured ethyl alcohol was natural due to evaporation, justifying the remission of duty as accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the validity of the order-in-appeal based on the natural cause of evaporation and the storage conditions of the ethyl alcohol.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:55:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 442 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110647</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the order-in-appeal that set aside a duty demand of Rs. 474 for the period from September 1999 to December 1999. The Tribunal found that the loss of denatured ethyl alcohol was natural due to evaporation, justifying the remission of duty as accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the validity of the order-in-appeal based on the natural cause of evaporation and the storage conditions of the ethyl alcohol.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>