<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 436 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110640</link>
    <description>Nylon monofilament cleared in hanks or cut lengths was treated as monofilament yarn for exemption under Notification 5/98. The interpretation turned on harmonious construction: the tariff heading&#039;s use of &quot;monofilament&quot; could not make the notification&#039;s wording &quot;monofilament yarn&quot; redundant, and the explanatory notes showed that cut lengths did not remove the goods from the relevant tariff heading. On that basis, continuous-length filament was not required for exemption, and the goods were held eligible. The issue of denier specification was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:31:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 436 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110640</link>
      <description>Nylon monofilament cleared in hanks or cut lengths was treated as monofilament yarn for exemption under Notification 5/98. The interpretation turned on harmonious construction: the tariff heading&#039;s use of &quot;monofilament&quot; could not make the notification&#039;s wording &quot;monofilament yarn&quot; redundant, and the explanatory notes showed that cut lengths did not remove the goods from the relevant tariff heading. On that basis, continuous-length filament was not required for exemption, and the goods were held eligible. The issue of denier specification was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>