https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110633 The court dismissed the writ petition citing lack of territorial jurisdiction and emphasized the need for the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. It held that the Stock Exchange falls under the definition of the State, making the writ petition maintainable. The court also highlighted that the Stock Exchange must consider the petitioner's application if the required particulars are provided, with the option for the petitioner to seek redressal if the Stock Exchange fails to act accordingly. en-us Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:04:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110633 The court dismissed the writ petition citing lack of territorial jurisdiction and emphasized the need for the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. It held that the Stock Exchange falls under the definition of the State, making the writ petition maintainable. The court also highlighted that the Stock Exchange must consider the petitioner's application if the required particulars are provided, with the option for the petitioner to seek redressal if the Stock Exchange fails to act accordingly. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110633