<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 436 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110612</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on a refund claim, applying Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 to calculate the time period under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the taxpayer, allowing the refund claim filed within the specified time limit by excluding the date of duty payment. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:20:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 436 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110612</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on a refund claim, applying Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 to calculate the time period under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the taxpayer, allowing the refund claim filed within the specified time limit by excluding the date of duty payment. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>