https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110609 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's jurisdiction to address aspects not covered by a settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, emphasizing its limited scope. The imposition of redemption fine and penalty was deemed appropriate due to mitigating circumstances, leading to the rejection of appeals. The decision provided detailed analysis on settlement, jurisdiction, and penalties, clarifying the Commissioner's authority beyond duty liability on shortages. en-us Fri, 26 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:13:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110609 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's jurisdiction to address aspects not covered by a settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, emphasizing its limited scope. The imposition of redemption fine and penalty was deemed appropriate due to mitigating circumstances, leading to the rejection of appeals. The decision provided detailed analysis on settlement, jurisdiction, and penalties, clarifying the Commissioner's authority beyond duty liability on shortages. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110609