<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 422 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110592</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the Revenue&#039;s stay application for the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order in favor of the assessee regarding additional trade discounts, cash discounts, and bonus. The Tribunal emphasized that since the Commissioner (Appeals) did not challenge his prior decision, there was no basis for granting a stay on the recent ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 422 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110592</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the Revenue&#039;s stay application for the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order in favor of the assessee regarding additional trade discounts, cash discounts, and bonus. The Tribunal emphasized that since the Commissioner (Appeals) did not challenge his prior decision, there was no basis for granting a stay on the recent ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>