<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 421 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110591</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, revoking the penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed by the original authority for overvaluation of export goods. The Tribunal emphasized the need for accurate valuation in claiming drawback, highlighting the repercussions of overvaluation and the penalties involved. It stressed the importance of transparency and consistency in pricing declarations for export goods to prevent the misuse of drawback benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:25:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 421 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110591</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, revoking the penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed by the original authority for overvaluation of export goods. The Tribunal emphasized the need for accurate valuation in claiming drawback, highlighting the repercussions of overvaluation and the penalties involved. It stressed the importance of transparency and consistency in pricing declarations for export goods to prevent the misuse of drawback benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>