https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110590 The appellant-company faced a demand of Rs. 90,714.00 for clearing goods under export without paying duty and a shortage of 33.300 MTs. Despite claiming the shortages were within limits, lower authorities upheld the demand and imposed a personal penalty. The appellant cited a government letter allowing condonation of handling and transit loss up to 1% for Charge Chrome clearances. The Tribunal, considering previous rulings and Board instructions, set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief and disposing of the stay petition. en-us Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:24:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110590 The appellant-company faced a demand of Rs. 90,714.00 for clearing goods under export without paying duty and a shortage of 33.300 MTs. Despite claiming the shortages were within limits, lower authorities upheld the demand and imposed a personal penalty. The appellant cited a government letter allowing condonation of handling and transit loss up to 1% for Charge Chrome clearances. The Tribunal, considering previous rulings and Board instructions, set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief and disposing of the stay petition. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110590