<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 405 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110570</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the calculation of duty under Notification 2/95 for goods cleared by a 100% export-oriented unit to the domestic tariff area. The Commissioner applied a method of calculation from Circular No. 7/01, while the appellant argued for a different method based on a Tribunal decision. Due to conflicting interpretations in previous cases, the Tribunal decided to refer the matter to a Larger Bench for resolution to provide clarity on the correct method of duty calculation under the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:26:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 405 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110570</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the calculation of duty under Notification 2/95 for goods cleared by a 100% export-oriented unit to the domestic tariff area. The Commissioner applied a method of calculation from Circular No. 7/01, while the appellant argued for a different method based on a Tribunal decision. Due to conflicting interpretations in previous cases, the Tribunal decided to refer the matter to a Larger Bench for resolution to provide clarity on the correct method of duty calculation under the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>