<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 449 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110565</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, ruled in favor of the Revenue in a dispute over the determination of the rate of duty for imported goods kept in a warehouse beyond the bond period. The Tribunal held that the date of deemed removal for such goods is the bond expiry date, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court in M/s. Kesoram Rayon. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of applying established legal principles in such cases and set aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:40:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 449 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110565</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, ruled in favor of the Revenue in a dispute over the determination of the rate of duty for imported goods kept in a warehouse beyond the bond period. The Tribunal held that the date of deemed removal for such goods is the bond expiry date, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court in M/s. Kesoram Rayon. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of applying established legal principles in such cases and set aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>