https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110564 The court deferred a decision on the maintainability of the winding-up petition due to parallel proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal-III, Delhi. Emphasizing procedural progress, the court directed the respondent to file a reply to prevent delay. Setting deadlines, the court aimed for timely resolution while considering the maintainability issue in due course. Balancing party interests, the court sought efficient adjudication amidst complexities from the concurrent proceedings. en-us Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:21:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110564 The court deferred a decision on the maintainability of the winding-up petition due to parallel proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal-III, Delhi. Emphasizing procedural progress, the court directed the respondent to file a reply to prevent delay. Setting deadlines, the court aimed for timely resolution while considering the maintainability issue in due course. Balancing party interests, the court sought efficient adjudication amidst complexities from the concurrent proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110564