<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 403 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110544</link>
    <description>A surety&#039;s liability is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor, so a creditor is not required to exhaust remedies against the principal debtor or the debtor&#039;s estate before proceeding against guarantors. Notice under the SARFAESI Act had been issued to both the debtor and the guarantors, and no independent legal basis was shown to restrain recovery or auction. The Court therefore rejected the contention that action had to be taken first against the principal debtor and held that the guarantors could not prevent recovery or auction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:00:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 403 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110544</link>
      <description>A surety&#039;s liability is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor, so a creditor is not required to exhaust remedies against the principal debtor or the debtor&#039;s estate before proceeding against guarantors. Notice under the SARFAESI Act had been issued to both the debtor and the guarantors, and no independent legal basis was shown to restrain recovery or auction. The Court therefore rejected the contention that action had to be taken first against the principal debtor and held that the guarantors could not prevent recovery or auction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>