https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110529 The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistakes in the Final Order, affirming the direction for redemption of goods on payment of a fine. It held that the decision was made after thorough consideration of facts and legal provisions, emphasizing that errors of judgment could only be rectified by the appellate court, not the Tribunal under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal clarified that the dissatisfaction with the judgment's outcome did not constitute a rectifiable error and underscored the need to pursue challenges through the appellate remedy. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:55:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110529 The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistakes in the Final Order, affirming the direction for redemption of goods on payment of a fine. It held that the decision was made after thorough consideration of facts and legal provisions, emphasizing that errors of judgment could only be rectified by the appellate court, not the Tribunal under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal clarified that the dissatisfaction with the judgment's outcome did not constitute a rectifiable error and underscored the need to pursue challenges through the appellate remedy. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 17 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110529