<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 623 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110520</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s imported &quot;tube assembly&quot; goods were in dispute due to import license requirements. The court found that the goods, intended for industrial sealant packaging, did not fall under the category of consumer goods subject to import restrictions. The judgment allowed Appeal C/50/98 and partially allowed Appeal C/49/98, setting aside the penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:42:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 623 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110520</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s imported &quot;tube assembly&quot; goods were in dispute due to import license requirements. The court found that the goods, intended for industrial sealant packaging, did not fall under the category of consumer goods subject to import restrictions. The judgment allowed Appeal C/50/98 and partially allowed Appeal C/49/98, setting aside the penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>