<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 397 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110517</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the company petition for winding up the respondent-company under sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner failed to establish the receipt of a legal and valid notice demanding payment as required by section 434. The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling statutory requirements before seeking winding up, highlighting the misuse of winding-up petitions for debt recovery purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:33:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 397 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110517</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the company petition for winding up the respondent-company under sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner failed to establish the receipt of a legal and valid notice demanding payment as required by section 434. The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling statutory requirements before seeking winding up, highlighting the misuse of winding-up petitions for debt recovery purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>