<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 621 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110515</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the denial of credit for duty paid on single yarn used in manufacturing doubled yarn, considering doubled yarn as an intermediate product ineligible for credit. The penalty imposed by the Deputy Commissioner was set aside as unjustified, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:25:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 621 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110515</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the denial of credit for duty paid on single yarn used in manufacturing doubled yarn, considering doubled yarn as an intermediate product ineligible for credit. The penalty imposed by the Deputy Commissioner was set aside as unjustified, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>