<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 619 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110511</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that amounts depicted as Excise duty must be deposited under Section 11D, while amounts shown only as per Rule 57CC are not covered by this provision. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the original authority for reworking the amounts on clearance documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:14:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 619 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110511</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that amounts depicted as Excise duty must be deposited under Section 11D, while amounts shown only as per Rule 57CC are not covered by this provision. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the original authority for reworking the amounts on clearance documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>