https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110507 The appeals challenging the rejection by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to exceeding the limitation period were dismissed. The court held that the period of limitation should start from the date of affixing the order on the factory gate, not from obtaining a copy. Despite notice, the appellant did not appear, and the appeals were disposed of. The statutory authorities cannot entertain appeals filed beyond the permitted period, and the time for condonation of delay had lapsed. The method of service by affixing on the factory gate was deemed valid, and the appeals were dismissed for exceeding the time limit. en-us Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:07:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110507 The appeals challenging the rejection by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to exceeding the limitation period were dismissed. The court held that the period of limitation should start from the date of affixing the order on the factory gate, not from obtaining a copy. Despite notice, the appellant did not appear, and the appeals were disposed of. The statutory authorities cannot entertain appeals filed beyond the permitted period, and the time for condonation of delay had lapsed. The method of service by affixing on the factory gate was deemed valid, and the appeals were dismissed for exceeding the time limit. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110507