<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 391 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110504</link>
    <description>A winding-up petition is not a proper forum for adjudicating a genuinely disputed debt, particularly where liability, interest calculations, and other factual issues require evidence; such claims must be pursued in civil proceedings. The period during which inquiry, scheme consideration, or implementation under the sick industrial company framework remained pending is excluded in computing limitation, and the continuation of the sanctioned scheme until 31-3-1999 meant the suspension period could not be ignored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:59:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 391 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110504</link>
      <description>A winding-up petition is not a proper forum for adjudicating a genuinely disputed debt, particularly where liability, interest calculations, and other factual issues require evidence; such claims must be pursued in civil proceedings. The period during which inquiry, scheme consideration, or implementation under the sick industrial company framework remained pending is excluded in computing limitation, and the continuation of the sanctioned scheme until 31-3-1999 meant the suspension period could not be ignored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>