https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110497 The court held that a complaint under Section 56 of FERA, 1973 is not premature if filed before the imposition of a penalty under Section 50. Criminal prosecution can proceed independently of adjudication proceedings. Regarding the authorization of the complainant, the court found that the general authorization provided in a notification was sufficient, and no specific authorization for each case was required. The cases were directed to proceed before the respective courts, with instructions to expedite the proceedings and vacate any interim orders previously granted. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:41:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110497 The court held that a complaint under Section 56 of FERA, 1973 is not premature if filed before the imposition of a penalty under Section 50. Criminal prosecution can proceed independently of adjudication proceedings. Regarding the authorization of the complainant, the court found that the general authorization provided in a notification was sufficient, and no specific authorization for each case was required. The cases were directed to proceed before the respective courts, with instructions to expedite the proceedings and vacate any interim orders previously granted. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110497