<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 622 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110496</link>
    <description>The penalty amount in the case was initially reduced from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 75,000 but further decreased to Rs. 50,000. This reduction was due to the duty evaded amounting to Rs. 39,780. The penalty imposed was considered appropriate due to the suppression of facts but was adjusted based on the duty payment made. The court upheld the impugned order with the alteration in the penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:39:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 622 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110496</link>
      <description>The penalty amount in the case was initially reduced from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 75,000 but further decreased to Rs. 50,000. This reduction was due to the duty evaded amounting to Rs. 39,780. The penalty imposed was considered appropriate due to the suppression of facts but was adjusted based on the duty payment made. The court upheld the impugned order with the alteration in the penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>