https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110494 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's amendment of the EA-3 Form due to a typographical error. The appeal challenging the validity of the order-in-appeal was successful as the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to comply with the remand order. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to reconsider the case, stressing compliance with the remand order and a timely resolution within four months. The impugned order was modified, emphasizing the importance of following remand orders and proper consideration of facts for a just decision. en-us Wed, 28 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:37:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110494 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's amendment of the EA-3 Form due to a typographical error. The appeal challenging the validity of the order-in-appeal was successful as the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to comply with the remand order. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to reconsider the case, stressing compliance with the remand order and a timely resolution within four months. The impugned order was modified, emphasizing the importance of following remand orders and proper consideration of facts for a just decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110494