<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 373 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110479</link>
    <description>The court quashed the denial decision of transferring an importer/exporter code due to a director&#039;s association with a company under investigation. Emphasizing the need for controlling interest along with directorship for refusal under Rule 7(1)(f) of the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, the court criticized the lack of communication and original records. The judgment allowed a two-month inquiry period into the director&#039;s controlling interest in the other company, failing which the code transfer should proceed. The writ petition was allowed, with parties bearing their own costs, and related applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:51:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 373 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110479</link>
      <description>The court quashed the denial decision of transferring an importer/exporter code due to a director&#039;s association with a company under investigation. Emphasizing the need for controlling interest along with directorship for refusal under Rule 7(1)(f) of the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, the court criticized the lack of communication and original records. The judgment allowed a two-month inquiry period into the director&#039;s controlling interest in the other company, failing which the code transfer should proceed. The writ petition was allowed, with parties bearing their own costs, and related applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>