<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 409 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110466</link>
    <description>Where a transfer-of-residence policy for import of a second-hand car prescribes only the stated conditions, no additional requirement of prior registration in the importer&#039;s own name can be implied. The policy allowed import by a person settling in India if there was no direct or indirect remittance of foreign exchange from India and the vehicle remained subject to a no-sale condition for two years. On the facts, there was no material showing foreign exchange outgo from India and the importer was willing to comply with the undertaking and endorsement requirements. Eligibility for clearance was therefore established, and confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:52:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 409 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110466</link>
      <description>Where a transfer-of-residence policy for import of a second-hand car prescribes only the stated conditions, no additional requirement of prior registration in the importer&#039;s own name can be implied. The policy allowed import by a person settling in India if there was no direct or indirect remittance of foreign exchange from India and the vehicle remained subject to a no-sale condition for two years. On the facts, there was no material showing foreign exchange outgo from India and the importer was willing to comply with the undertaking and endorsement requirements. Eligibility for clearance was therefore established, and confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>