<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 404 - CESTAT, new delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 34 unaccounted A/C Kits found during a factory visit but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 10,000. The penalty imposed on the Director was set aside due to lack of evidence showing intent to evade duty payment. The case emphasized the necessity of proving intent in penalty cases related to duty evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:46:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 404 - CESTAT, new delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 34 unaccounted A/C Kits found during a factory visit but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 10,000. The penalty imposed on the Director was set aside due to lack of evidence showing intent to evade duty payment. The case emphasized the necessity of proving intent in penalty cases related to duty evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>