<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 399 - CESTAT, mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of packing costs in the assessable value of excisable goods, stating that the packing was essential for marketability and transportation. The demand for duty for a specific period was found to be time-barred due to the department&#039;s prior knowledge of the deduction claims, resulting in a reduction of penalty and partial allowance of one appeal while rejecting another.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:25:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 399 - CESTAT, mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of packing costs in the assessable value of excisable goods, stating that the packing was essential for marketability and transportation. The demand for duty for a specific period was found to be time-barred due to the department&#039;s prior knowledge of the deduction claims, resulting in a reduction of penalty and partial allowance of one appeal while rejecting another.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>