<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 398 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of betel nuts seized from Railways as the revenue failed to prove foreign origin and smuggled character. The appellant&#039;s ownership claim was doubted due to lack of supporting documents, despite possessing Railway Receipts. The Commissioner&#039;s failure to return the goods exceeded the remand scope, leading to the appeal being allowed for the goods&#039; return to the appellant in compliance with the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:21:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 398 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of betel nuts seized from Railways as the revenue failed to prove foreign origin and smuggled character. The appellant&#039;s ownership claim was doubted due to lack of supporting documents, despite possessing Railway Receipts. The Commissioner&#039;s failure to return the goods exceeded the remand scope, leading to the appeal being allowed for the goods&#039; return to the appellant in compliance with the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>