<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 360 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110440</link>
    <description>An unpaid loan claim supported by an account-payee cheque, dishonour of that cheque, and an unanswered statutory demand notice justified admission of the winding-up petition. The company entered no opposition despite notice, leaving no defence to the petitioning creditor&#039;s claim. The petition was admitted for the principal debt with interest, and the creditor was given liberty to recover the balance if instalment payments were not made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:01:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 360 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110440</link>
      <description>An unpaid loan claim supported by an account-payee cheque, dishonour of that cheque, and an unanswered statutory demand notice justified admission of the winding-up petition. The company entered no opposition despite notice, leaving no defence to the petitioning creditor&#039;s claim. The petition was admitted for the principal debt with interest, and the creditor was given liberty to recover the balance if instalment payments were not made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>