<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 391 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110434</link>
    <description>Excise duty applies only where a process results in manufacture, meaning the emergence of a new and distinct commercial commodity with a separate identity, character or use. Branding, polishing, affixing MRP and packing of locks received in assembled form did not change their essential identity, so marketability alone could not establish manufacture. On that basis, the demand, penalties and confiscation against the manufacturer were set aside, along with connected penalties. The disputes relating to shortages, raw material and alleged job-work removals were not finally determined on the existing record and required fresh examination, including valuation and factual verification, with remand for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 391 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110434</link>
      <description>Excise duty applies only where a process results in manufacture, meaning the emergence of a new and distinct commercial commodity with a separate identity, character or use. Branding, polishing, affixing MRP and packing of locks received in assembled form did not change their essential identity, so marketability alone could not establish manufacture. On that basis, the demand, penalties and confiscation against the manufacturer were set aside, along with connected penalties. The disputes relating to shortages, raw material and alleged job-work removals were not finally determined on the existing record and required fresh examination, including valuation and factual verification, with remand for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>