<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 332 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110431</link>
    <description>The Court confirmed the registration of an FIR and ongoing investigation into missing machinery, requiring no further directions. Centurion Bank Limited and its dismantling agent were found responsible for the loss of machinery but damages were deemed unquantifiable in the summary proceeding. The Court directed the pursuit of legal action by the affected party. Laxity and collusion of officials were noted, leading to a loss to the public exchequer, prompting investigations and corrective measures. Compliance reports were ordered within six months, and inventory reports were to be shared, concluding the case with damages left for substantive proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 332 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110431</link>
      <description>The Court confirmed the registration of an FIR and ongoing investigation into missing machinery, requiring no further directions. Centurion Bank Limited and its dismantling agent were found responsible for the loss of machinery but damages were deemed unquantifiable in the summary proceeding. The Court directed the pursuit of legal action by the affected party. Laxity and collusion of officials were noted, leading to a loss to the public exchequer, prompting investigations and corrective measures. Compliance reports were ordered within six months, and inventory reports were to be shared, concluding the case with damages left for substantive proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>