https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110428 The appeal filed by Mayur Chemicals was denied as the Supreme Court held that Mayur Chemicals did not have the legal standing to appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the denial of credit taken by Hico Products Ltd. The Court referenced the concept of an "aggrieved person" and determined that despite claiming financial loss, Mayur Chemicals was not legally aggrieved. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the denial of credit by the Assistant Commissioner to Hico Products Ltd. was reinstated. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:21:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110428 The appeal filed by Mayur Chemicals was denied as the Supreme Court held that Mayur Chemicals did not have the legal standing to appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the denial of credit taken by Hico Products Ltd. The Court referenced the concept of an "aggrieved person" and determined that despite claiming financial loss, Mayur Chemicals was not legally aggrieved. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the denial of credit by the Assistant Commissioner to Hico Products Ltd. was reinstated. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110428