<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 386 - CESTAT, chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110423</link>
    <description>Refund claims under the excise refund provisions are not barred where they are filed within six months from the relevant date, even if supporting documents are submitted separately or the application is not initially in the expected form. However, refund is available only if the claimant rebuts the statutory presumption that the duty burden was passed on and proves non-passing by evidence. Mere assertion that prices remained unchanged, or that duty was not separately indicated, is insufficient. On the facts, no reliable evidence displaced the presumption, so the refund was not admissible to the assessee and had to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:13:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 386 - CESTAT, chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110423</link>
      <description>Refund claims under the excise refund provisions are not barred where they are filed within six months from the relevant date, even if supporting documents are submitted separately or the application is not initially in the expected form. However, refund is available only if the claimant rebuts the statutory presumption that the duty burden was passed on and proves non-passing by evidence. Mere assertion that prices remained unchanged, or that duty was not separately indicated, is insufficient. On the facts, no reliable evidence displaced the presumption, so the refund was not admissible to the assessee and had to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>